{"id":19816,"date":"2013-10-31T11:41:51","date_gmt":"2013-10-31T04:41:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/?p=19816"},"modified":"2017-11-24T09:55:04","modified_gmt":"2017-11-24T02:55:04","slug":"penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis","title":{"rendered":"Penyebab deforestasi menghilang dalam retorika REDD+ : Analisis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>BOGOR, Indonesia (31 Oktober 2013) \u2014 Perdebatan tentang REDD+ (Pengurangan Emisi dari Deforestasi dan Degradasi hutan) menyingkirkan isu fundamental saat apa sebenarnya penyebab deforestasi terlewatkan di dalam pembahasan agenda utama, demikian <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1389934113001482\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">temuan analisa media<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Ketika pemerintah, masyarakat sipil dan sektor swasta di enam negara yang dianalisis berbicara secara terbuka tentang REDD+ &#8212; suatu program dukungan PBB yang bertujuan untuk mengurangi emisi global gas rumah kaca dengan menciptakan insentif supaya menjaga pohon-pohon tetap berdiri \u2013 seringkali mereka menghindari berbicara tentang dasar dari masalah-masalah tersebut.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKami menemukan, meski banyak diskusi internasional tentang isu REDD+, seperti siapa yang harus membayar untuk apa, para aktor tidak banyak berbicara mengenai isu nasional,\u201d ujar Monica Di Gregorio, mitra senior Pusat Penelitian Kehutahan Internasional (CIFOR) dan dosen di Universitas Leed, Inggris.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAktor negara dan kepentingan kuat berpura-pura mendukung REDD+, namun mereka cenderung bicara akan hal ini dengan cara yang dangkal dan terlalu disederhanakan, menarik retorika sebagai situasi \u2018menang-menang\u2019,\u201d kata Di Gregorio. \u201cMereka tidak benar-benar melakukan reformasi yang diperlukan untuk membuat REDD+ terlaksana.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Temuan riset ini, dilaporkan dalam <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1389934113001482\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">\u201cGoverning the design of national REDD+: An analysis of the power of agency<\/a> (Mengelola desain REDD+ nasional: Analisis kekuatan lembaga),\u201d yang ditulis oleh Di Gregorio bersama ilmuwan CIFOR Maria Brockhaus dan Sofi Mardiah, memunculkan pertanyaan apakah menghindari topik utama akan mengganggu keberhasilan REDD+.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKita tahu bahwa untuk memiliki kebijakan REDD+ yang efektif, Anda harus menangani penyebab deforestasi \u2013 tidak akan ada reduksi emisi tanpa itu,\u201d kata Di Gregorio.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTidak cukup hanya membangun projek, atau untuk mengatakan \u2018ini prosedurnya\u2019 dan \u2018ini mekanismenya.\u2019 Menerapkan REDD+ berarti mengatasi beberapa isu paling menantang, tetapi jika mereka tidak membicarakan masalah sebenarnya, mereka tidak akan bisa mengatasinya.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><b>KERANJANG \u201cTERLALU KERAS\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Mendapatkan latar belakang \u201cmasalah sebenarnya\u201d berarti mengatasi penyebab deforestasi dan degradasi hutan, dikenal sebagai \u201cpenyebab.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/1748-9326\/7\/4\/044009\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">Penilaian terbaru mengenai penyebab langsung deforestasi dan degradasi hutan di 100 negara berkembang<\/a> menemukan bahwa pertanian menyebabkan 73 persen deforestasi, terbagi antara pertanian komersial (40 persen) dan pertanian penghidupan (33 persen). Penyebab lain adalah pertambangan (7 persen), infrastruktur (10 persen) dan perluasan kota (10 persen).<\/p>\n<p>Ekstraksi dan penebangan kayu ditemukan menjadi penyebab 52 persen degradasi hutan (terutama di Amerika Latin dan Asia), dengan pengumpulan kayu bakar dan produksi arang (terutama di Afrika) menyumbang 31 persen, kebakaran tak disengaja 9 persen dan gembala ternak 7 persen.<\/p>\n<p>Seringkali yang menghalangi penyebab langsung seperti ini adalah kebijakan nasional, seperti rejim pajak dan perdagangan; kebijakan moneter dan strategi pembangunan ekonomi; serta kekuatan pasar \u2013 semuanya secara tidak langsung mendorong deforestasi, <a href=\"\/\/www.cifor.org\/online-library\/browse\/view-publication\/publication\/341.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">demikian ditunjukkan analisis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Melaporkan <a href=\"https:\/\/unfccc.int\/national_reports\/non-annex_i_natcom\/submitted_natcom\/items\/653.php\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">data nasional mengenai penyebab utama adalah persyaratan bagi Komunikasi Nasional kepada UNFCCC<\/a> (Konvensi Kerangka Kerja PBB mengenai Perubahan Iklim), yang telah disetorkan oleh enam negara yang dikaji dalam analisis media: <a href=\"\/\/www.cifor.org\/online-library\/browse\/view-publication\/publication\/3423.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">Brasil<\/a>, <a href=\"\/\/www.cifor.org\/online-library\/browse\/view-publication\/publication\/3388.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">Kamerun<\/a>, <a href=\"\/\/www.cifor.org\/online-library\/browse\/view-publication\/publication\/3388.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">Indonesia<\/a>, <a href=\"\/\/www.cifor.org\/online-library\/browse\/view-publication\/publication\/3909.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">Nepal<\/a>, <a href=\"\/\/www.cifor.org\/online-library\/browse\/view-publication\/publication\/3909.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">Papua Nugini<\/a> dan <a href=\"\/\/www.cifor.org\/online-library\/browse\/view-publication\/publication\/3389.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">Vietnam<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Selain Brasil, semua negara ini juga telah melaporkan Rencana Persiapan Kesiapan REDD+ kepada <a href=\"http:\/\/www.forestcarbonpartnership.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">Fasilitas Kemitraan Hutan Karbon Bank Dunia<\/a>, yang juga mensyaratkan informasi mengenai penyebab.<\/p>\n<p>Walaupun begitu, bagi banyak negara kajian, informasi mengenai penyebab tidak lengkap, terdapat sedikit keraguan bahwa pengambil kebijakan negara sadar mengenai penyebab deforestasi \u2013 dan mereka tahu bahwa reformasi kebijakan diperlukan.<\/p>\n<p>Kurang jelas mengapa mereka terus menghindar menangani isu ini dalam forum publik.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDugaan terbaik saya adalah ini merupakan bentuk resistansi politis,\u201d kata Di Gregorio.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTerdapat persepsi bahwa jika negara melakukan reformasi sesungguhnya atau secara kukuh berjalan di arah REDD+, mereka kemudian harus membayarnya dengan kehilangan pembangunan.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Contohnya, pemerintah bisa kehilangan pemasukan penting jika mereka memutuskan untuk melupakan projek pertanian menguntungkan yang melibatkan pembersihan hutan, seperti perkebunan sawit baru, untuk mendukung REDD+.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBanyak kepentingan kuat di balik deforestasi, pertanian misalnya, dan pemerintah sangat hati-hati dengan timbal baliknya,\u201d tambah Gregorio.<\/p>\n<p><b>ISU KERAS<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Tidak hanya kepentingan-kepentingan ini yang mendukung  \u201curusan apa adanya\u201d yang melompati isu.<\/p>\n<p>Dorongan perubahan di enam negara, termasuk lembaga swadaya masyarakat serta kelompok masyarakat sipil lain, ditemukan berkonsentrasi pada keadilan lingkungan, pengaman dan \u201ckeuntungan-bersama\u201d REDD+, seperti bagaimana REDD+ akan mempengaruhi penghidupan dan apakah ada keadilan dalam pengambilan keputusan.<\/p>\n<p>Sementara isu-isu ini penting bagi reformasi kebijakan REDD+, temuan mengungkap bahwa masyarakat sipit tidak secara eksplisit mendiskusikan akar masalah.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKami pikir LSM konservasi khususnya akan lebih vokal dan perhatian pada penyebab deforestasi,\u201d kata Di Gregorio.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIni menarik karena banyak aktor LSM internasional, dan mereka cukup kuat \u2013 tetapi mereja juga tidak mengarah pada pertanyaan inti ini.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>REDD+ mungkin tidak bisa maju, kecuali pemerintah dan koalisi domestik untuk perubahan mulai mendorong prinsip-prinsip dan isu yang sulit menjadi agenda.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cJika kita ingin menerapkan REDD+ dan mendapat hasil reduksi emisi, kita perlu membuka diskusi,\u201d kata Di Gregorio. \u201cIni bisa terjadi ketika kebijakan REDD+ dibangun, secepat isu ini ditangani, kebijakannya akan lebih efektif.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Di Gregorio dan mitranya kini menganalisa data tersebut untuk melihat isu mana dalam debat REDD+ yang paling terpolarisasi \u2013 isu yang paling membutuhkan resolusi tetapi akan paling sulit diselesaikan.<\/p>\n<p>Karya ini merupakan bagian dari Program Riset CGIAR mengenai Hutan, Pohon dan Agroforestri serta didukung oleh NORAD, AUSAID, DFID dan EC.<\/p>\n<p>Untuk informasi lebih mengenai informasi yang didiskusikan dalam artikel ini, silahkan hubungi Maria Brockhaus di <a href=\"mailto:m.brockhaus@cgiar.org\">mailto:m.brockhaus@cgiar.org<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><em>Topik \u2013 topik ini akan tercakup di dalam Global Landscape Forum di dalam Diskusi Forum <a href=\"http:\/\/www.landscapes.org\/agenda-item\/day-2-nov-17-2\/discussion-forums\/redd-performance-landscape-level\/#.Um4srpT4hcQ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">REDD+ Performance at the Landscape Level<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BOGOR, Indonesia (31 Oktober 2013) \u2014 Perdebatan tentang REDD+ (Pengurangan Emisi dari Deforestasi dan Degradasi hutan) menyingkirkan isu fundamental saat apa sebenarnya penyebab deforestasi terlewatkan di dalam pembahasan agenda utama, demikian temuan analisa media. Ketika pemerintah, masyarakat sipil dan sektor swasta di enam negara yang dianalisis berbicara secara terbuka tentang REDD+ &#8212; suatu program dukungan [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":36396,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[462,161,137,180,151],"tags":[],"language":[2171],"location":[12215],"tag-bahasa":[2522,2520,4199,2604,4765,2819,4809,4766],"tag-espanol":[],"tag-francais":[],"type-espanol":[],"type-bahasa":[3099],"type-english":[],"type-francais":[],"coauthors":[1048],"class_list":["post-19816","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-climate-change-energy","category-deforestation","category-forest-management-restoration","category-mitigating-climate-change","category-redd-2","language-bahasa-indonesia","location-global","tag-bahasa-deforestasi","tag-bahasa-konservasi","tag-bahasa-maria-brockhaus","tag-bahasa-mitigasi","tag-bahasa-monica-digregorio","tag-bahasa-redd","tag-bahasa-sofi-mardiah","tag-bahasa-universitas-leeds","type-bahasa-berita"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.4 (Yoast SEO v28.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Penyebab deforestasi menghilang dalam retorika REDD+ : Analisis - Landscape Alliance Forests News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"id_ID\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Penyebab deforestasi menghilang dalam retorika REDD+ : Analisis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"BOGOR, Indonesia (31 Oktober 2013) \u2014 Perdebatan tentang REDD+ (Pengurangan Emisi dari Deforestasi dan Degradasi hutan) menyingkirkan isu fundamental saat apa sebenarnya penyebab deforestasi terlewatkan di dalam pembahasan agenda utama, demikian temuan analisa media. Ketika pemerintah, masyarakat sipil dan sektor swasta di enam negara yang dianalisis berbicara secara terbuka tentang REDD+ &#8212; suatu program dukungan [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Landscape Alliance Forests News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CIFORICRAF\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-10-31T04:41:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-24T02:55:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/5712174626_edc31b5a94_z-500x333_bhs.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"333\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Imogen Badgery-Parker\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@CIFOR_ICRAF\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@CIFOR_ICRAF\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Imogen Badgery-Parker\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b432e2c85d34ce3bae91c0c84bc7a433\"},\"headline\":\"Penyebab deforestasi menghilang dalam retorika REDD+ : Analisis\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-10-31T04:41:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-24T02:55:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis\"},\"wordCount\":826,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2013\\\/10\\\/5712174626_edc31b5a94_z-500x333_bhs.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Climate change &amp; energy\",\"Deforestation\",\"Forest management &amp; restoration\",\"Mitigation\",\"REDD+\"],\"inLanguage\":\"id\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#respond\"]}],\"copyrightYear\":\"2013\",\"copyrightHolder\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/#organization\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis\",\"name\":\"Penyebab deforestasi menghilang dalam retorika REDD+ : Analisis - Landscape Alliance Forests News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2013\\\/10\\\/5712174626_edc31b5a94_z-500x333_bhs.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-10-31T04:41:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-24T02:55:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"id\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"id\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2013\\\/10\\\/5712174626_edc31b5a94_z-500x333_bhs.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2013\\\/10\\\/5712174626_edc31b5a94_z-500x333_bhs.jpg\",\"width\":500,\"height\":333,\"caption\":\"Penilaian terbaru dari penyebab langsung deforestasi dan degradasi hutan di 100 negara berkembang menemukan bahwa pertanian adalah penyebab dari 73 persen deforestasi, terbagi antara pertanian komersial (40 persen) dan pertanian subsisten (33 persen). CIFOR \\\/ Douglas Sheil\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Penyebab deforestasi menghilang dalam retorika REDD+ : Analisis\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\",\"name\":\"Landscape Alliance Forests News\",\"description\":\"The latest news on REDD+, climate change, biofuels, gender, conservation, trade, deforestation, indigenous &amp; community groups, dry forests, food security, illegal logging, governance and biodiversity.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"id\"},{\"@type\":[\"Organization\",\"Place\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id#organization\",\"name\":\"CIFOR-ICRAF\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\",\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#local-main-organization-logo\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#local-main-organization-logo\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/CIFORICRAF\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/CIFOR_ICRAF\"],\"telephone\":[],\"openingHoursSpecification\":[{\"@type\":\"OpeningHoursSpecification\",\"dayOfWeek\":[\"Monday\",\"Tuesday\",\"Wednesday\",\"Thursday\",\"Friday\",\"Saturday\",\"Sunday\"],\"opens\":\"09:00\",\"closes\":\"17:00\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b432e2c85d34ce3bae91c0c84bc7a433\",\"name\":\"Imogen Badgery-Parker\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"id\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2c9801e9b043138c20307eaae570c03a49ddce371b8519ba3d0a16ccd0b4a55e?s=96&d=mm&r=g6675a1af9465017a6fbbf119288326cc\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2c9801e9b043138c20307eaae570c03a49ddce371b8519ba3d0a16ccd0b4a55e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2c9801e9b043138c20307eaae570c03a49ddce371b8519ba3d0a16ccd0b4a55e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Imogen Badgery-Parker\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/author\\\/imogen\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"id\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/id\\\/19816\\\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#local-main-organization-logo\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/cifor-icraf-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/cifor-icraf-logo.png\",\"width\":596,\"height\":250,\"caption\":\"CIFOR-ICRAF\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Penyebab deforestasi menghilang dalam retorika REDD+ : Analisis - Landscape Alliance Forests News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis","og_locale":"id_ID","og_type":"article","og_title":"Penyebab deforestasi menghilang dalam retorika REDD+ : Analisis","og_description":"BOGOR, Indonesia (31 Oktober 2013) \u2014 Perdebatan tentang REDD+ (Pengurangan Emisi dari Deforestasi dan Degradasi hutan) menyingkirkan isu fundamental saat apa sebenarnya penyebab deforestasi terlewatkan di dalam pembahasan agenda utama, demikian temuan analisa media. Ketika pemerintah, masyarakat sipil dan sektor swasta di enam negara yang dianalisis berbicara secara terbuka tentang REDD+ &#8212; suatu program dukungan [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis","og_site_name":"Landscape Alliance Forests News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CIFORICRAF","article_published_time":"2013-10-31T04:41:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-24T02:55:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":500,"height":333,"url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/5712174626_edc31b5a94_z-500x333_bhs.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Imogen Badgery-Parker","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@CIFOR_ICRAF","twitter_site":"@CIFOR_ICRAF","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis"},"author":{"name":"Imogen Badgery-Parker","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id#\/schema\/person\/b432e2c85d34ce3bae91c0c84bc7a433"},"headline":"Penyebab deforestasi menghilang dalam retorika REDD+ : Analisis","datePublished":"2013-10-31T04:41:51+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-24T02:55:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis"},"wordCount":826,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/5712174626_edc31b5a94_z-500x333_bhs.jpg","articleSection":["Climate change &amp; energy","Deforestation","Forest management &amp; restoration","Mitigation","REDD+"],"inLanguage":"id","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#respond"]}],"copyrightYear":"2013","copyrightHolder":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/#organization"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis","url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis","name":"Penyebab deforestasi menghilang dalam retorika REDD+ : Analisis - Landscape Alliance Forests News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/5712174626_edc31b5a94_z-500x333_bhs.jpg","datePublished":"2013-10-31T04:41:51+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-24T02:55:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"id","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"id","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/5712174626_edc31b5a94_z-500x333_bhs.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/5712174626_edc31b5a94_z-500x333_bhs.jpg","width":500,"height":333,"caption":"Penilaian terbaru dari penyebab langsung deforestasi dan degradasi hutan di 100 negara berkembang menemukan bahwa pertanian adalah penyebab dari 73 persen deforestasi, terbagi antara pertanian komersial (40 persen) dan pertanian subsisten (33 persen). CIFOR \/ Douglas Sheil"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Penyebab deforestasi menghilang dalam retorika REDD+ : Analisis"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id#website","url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id","name":"Landscape Alliance Forests News","description":"The latest news on REDD+, climate change, biofuels, gender, conservation, trade, deforestation, indigenous &amp; community groups, dry forests, food security, illegal logging, governance and biodiversity.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"id"},{"@type":["Organization","Place"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id#organization","name":"CIFOR-ICRAF","url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id","logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#local-main-organization-logo"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#local-main-organization-logo"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CIFORICRAF","https:\/\/x.com\/CIFOR_ICRAF"],"telephone":[],"openingHoursSpecification":[{"@type":"OpeningHoursSpecification","dayOfWeek":["Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday","Saturday","Sunday"],"opens":"09:00","closes":"17:00"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id#\/schema\/person\/b432e2c85d34ce3bae91c0c84bc7a433","name":"Imogen Badgery-Parker","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"id","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2c9801e9b043138c20307eaae570c03a49ddce371b8519ba3d0a16ccd0b4a55e?s=96&d=mm&r=g6675a1af9465017a6fbbf119288326cc","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2c9801e9b043138c20307eaae570c03a49ddce371b8519ba3d0a16ccd0b4a55e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2c9801e9b043138c20307eaae570c03a49ddce371b8519ba3d0a16ccd0b4a55e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Imogen Badgery-Parker"},"url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/author\/imogen"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"id","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/19816\/penyebab-deforestasi-menghilang-dalam-retorika-redd-analisis#local-main-organization-logo","url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/cifor-icraf-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/cifor-icraf-logo.png","width":596,"height":250,"caption":"CIFOR-ICRAF"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/5712174626_edc31b5a94_z-500x333_bhs.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19816","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19816"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19816\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36396"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19816"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19816"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19816"},{"taxonomy":"language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/language?post=19816"},{"taxonomy":"location","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/location?post=19816"},{"taxonomy":"tag-bahasa","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tag-bahasa?post=19816"},{"taxonomy":"tag-espanol","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tag-espanol?post=19816"},{"taxonomy":"tag-francais","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tag-francais?post=19816"},{"taxonomy":"type-espanol","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/type-espanol?post=19816"},{"taxonomy":"type-bahasa","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/type-bahasa?post=19816"},{"taxonomy":"type-english","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/type-english?post=19816"},{"taxonomy":"type-francais","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/type-francais?post=19816"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=19816"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}