{"id":1090,"date":"2011-04-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-04-19T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/?p=1090"},"modified":"2015-08-24T15:40:08","modified_gmt":"2015-08-24T08:40:08","slug":"la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd","title":{"rendered":"La formule \u00ab Gagnant-gagnant \u00bb est une description trop simpliste, et probablement fausse, de la REDD+"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Par <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cifor.cgiar.org\/nc\/about-us\/cifor-scientist-profiles\/scientist-profile.html?tx_ciforwebservice%5Bscid%5D=001014\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">Terry Sunderland<\/a><\/p>\n<p>La r\u00e9duction des \u00e9missions li\u00e9es \u00e0 la d\u00e9forestation et \u00e0 la d\u00e9gradation des for\u00eats (REDD) associ\u00e9e aux co-b\u00e9n\u00e9fices tels que la conservation de la biodiversit\u00e9, le d\u00e9veloppement durable et le renforcement des stocks de carbone par l\u2019afforestation (REDD+), et aussi accompagn\u00e9e de garanties appropri\u00e9es, offre un \u00ab financement potentiel sans pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent pour la conservation des for\u00eats et la biodiversit\u00e9 correspondante \u00bb. C\u2019est ce qu\u2019indique une \u00e9tude de Jacob Phelps et de ses coll\u00e8gues, publi\u00e9e dans un r\u00e9cent num\u00e9ro de <i>Conservation Letters<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Nombreux sont ceux qui en conviennent dans le monde. Depuis la conf\u00e9rence des Nations unies sur les changements climatiques de Bali en 2007, la REDD, sous toutes ses formes, a \u00e9t\u00e9 adopt\u00e9e avec une ferveur rarement observ\u00e9e dans les sph\u00e8res environnementales ou universitaires. Cependant, l\u2019\u00e9tude de J. Phelps ainsi qu\u2019un article de Paul Hirsch et de ses coll\u00e8gues publi\u00e9 dans <i>Conservation Biology<\/i> laissent entendre qu\u2019il convient de temp\u00e9rer cet optimisme. Ces deux publications font preuve de r\u00e9alisme : La REDD+ peut-elle r\u00e9pondre aux attentes en tant qu\u2019outil permettant d\u2019assurer la conservation de la biodiversit\u00e9 sur le long terme ?<\/p>\n<p>Loin d\u2019\u00eatre la solution \u00ab gagnant-gagnant \u00bb, toujours difficile \u00e0 atteindre, pour la conservation de la biodiversit\u00e9, la s\u00e9questration du carbone et la gestion durable des for\u00eats, la mise en \u0153uvre de la REDD+ pourrait comporter des risques, en particulier en ce qui concerne les investissements \u00e0 long terme. Par ailleurs, la comptabilisation des gagnants et des perdants reposant sur des informations fiables (c\u2019est-\u00e0-dire la reconnaissance et la n\u00e9gociation des compensations) d\u00e9terminera finalement le succ\u00e8s des programmes REDD+.<\/p>\n<p>J. Phelps et ses coll\u00e8gues attirent l\u2019attention sur les entraves \u00e0 l\u2019efficacit\u00e9 de la conservation, reconnues depuis longtemps, surtout le financement sur le long terme, dans le contexte des opportunit\u00e9s que repr\u00e9sente la REDD+. De nombreux organismes de conservation associent d\u00e9sormais la mise en \u0153uvre sur le terrain avec des actions visant \u00e0 att\u00e9nuer le carbone mondial dans l\u2019espoir de pouvoir ainsi obtenir des investissements soutenus dans des mesures de conservation de la biodiversit\u00e9 : le Graal de la protection de l\u2019environnement. Cependant, cet espoir est-il justifi\u00e9 ?<\/p>\n<p>Ils affirment \u00e9galement que les niveaux de financement engag\u00e9s aujourd\u2019hui dans la REDD+ sont nettement insuffisants par rapport \u00e0 ce qu\u2019il faudrait pour r\u00e9duire m\u00eame de moiti\u00e9 le taux actuel de la d\u00e9forestation. Ils constatent la r\u00e9ticence du secteur priv\u00e9 \u00e0 consacrer des fonds \u00e0 la REDD+ car les investissements carbone sont \u00ab volatiles et risqu\u00e9s \u00bb, d\u2019autant plus que la pl\u00e9thore de cr\u00e9dits REDD+ li\u00e9s aux for\u00eats pourrait faire baisser le prix du carbone.<\/p>\n<p>En outre, le fait de compter sur la volont\u00e9 du secteur financier public pour soutenir la REDD+ n\u2019est pas sans risque. Comme le remarquent Phelps <i>et al<\/i>., le premier corollaire des investissements volontaires actuels dans l\u2019att\u00e9nuation du changement climatique est l\u2019aide au d\u00e9veloppement. Cette aide est notoirement volatile et d\u00e9pendante soit de la situation politique des pays bailleurs de fonds, soit des changements souvent cycliques des priorit\u00e9s de financement. Par cons\u00e9quent, au plan mondial, des volumes de financements non n\u00e9gligeables, destin\u00e9s \u00e0 mettre en \u0153uvre la REDD+ de mani\u00e8re efficace, pourraient tout simplement ne pas se concr\u00e9tiser.<\/p>\n<p>Ayant essentiellement travaill\u00e9 sur l\u2019\u00e9tude des compensations dans le cadre de l\u2019int\u00e9gration de la conservation dans le d\u00e9veloppement, Hirsch et ses coll\u00e8gues appliquent les m\u00eames m\u00e9thodes et d\u00e9marches \u00e0 la r\u00e9flexion sur la REDD+. Ils reconnaissent que tout programme visant \u00e0 r\u00e9duire la d\u00e9forestation peut avoir des r\u00e9percussions n\u00e9gatives soit sur l\u2019environnement, soit sur les principales parties prenantes, ou encore sur les deux.<\/p>\n<p>Bien qu\u2019un ensemble de garanties claires dans le domaine social et celui de la biodiversit\u00e9 soit en cours d\u2019\u00e9laboration afin de limiter les pertes potentielles provoqu\u00e9es par la REDD+, Hirsch <i>et al<\/i>. sont conscients que la d\u00e9claration \u00ab gagnant-gagnant \u00bb est trop simpliste et potentiellement irr\u00e9aliste. Et \u00e0 terme, ceci peut se traduire par une certaine d\u00e9sillusion lorsque l\u2019on prendra conscience des pertes.<\/p>\n<p>\u00c0 l\u2019instar de nombreuses autres \u00e9tudes sur la REDD+, ils avancent que la conservation des for\u00eats dans un endroit entra\u00eenera presque certainement une conversion autre part (ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne de fuite). De surcro\u00eet, la d\u00e9finition du terme de \u00ab for\u00eat \u00bb reste controvers\u00e9e dans le domaine de la REDD+. Par exemple, les objectifs de la conservation de la biodiversit\u00e9 peuvent \u00eatre mis en \u00e9chec si les monocultures de plantations \u00e0 croissance rapide sont pr\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9es alors que leurs valeurs carbone sont \u00e9gales ou sup\u00e9rieures \u00e0 celles des for\u00eats naturelles plus vari\u00e9es mais \u00e0 la croissance plus lente.<\/p>\n<p>Il est int\u00e9ressant de noter que les deux articles divergent sur un point important. Si la \u00ab p\u00e9rennit\u00e9 \u00bb a souvent \u00e9t\u00e9 consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme une composante cl\u00e9 de la REDD+, Phelps <i>et al<\/i>. font observer qu\u2019un financement des programmes REDD+ sur une dur\u00e9e ind\u00e9termin\u00e9e semble irr\u00e9alisable. Au mieux, ils proposent que ce financement constitue une \u00ab strat\u00e9gie de transition \u00bb laissant le temps de mettre au point des technologies peu \u00e9mettrices en carbone qui conduiraient \u00e0 une r\u00e9duction des \u00e9missions. Hirsch <i>et al<\/i>. affirment d\u2019autre part que le principe du \u00ab pollueur-payeur \u00bb pourrait avoir un effet dissuasif sur la transition vers les industries peu carbon\u00e9es en p\u00e9nalisant le mouvement vers une \u00e9conomie mondiale verte. Si ce sc\u00e9nario se produit, la REDD+ pourrait engendrer des incitations perverses susceptibles d\u2019avoir dans l\u2019avenir des r\u00e9percussions consid\u00e9rables sur la conservation au plan mondial.<\/p>\n<p>En d\u00e9pit de ces pr\u00e9occupations, les deux \u00e9tudes font valoir que m\u00eame un m\u00e9canisme REDD+ imparfait est mieux qu\u2019une absence totale de financement pour la conservation de la biodiversit\u00e9. La communaut\u00e9 mondiale s\u2019est jusqu\u2019ici engag\u00e9e avec courage dans l\u2019\u00e9laboration du projet REDD+. Cependant, ainsi que l\u2019indiquent les deux articles, la r\u00e9ussite de la mise en \u0153uvre effective, efficace et \u00e9quitable de la REDD+ n\u00e9cessitera une bien meilleure compr\u00e9hension des risques d\u2019investissement sur le long terme et des compensations qui vont de pair.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hirsch, P.D., Adams, W.M., Brosius, J.P., Zia, A., Bariola, M. and Dammert, J.L. 2010 <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1523-1739.2010.01608.x\">Acknowledging conservation trade-offs and embracing complexity<\/a>. Conservation Biology 25: 259-264. Phelps, J., Webb, E.L., and Koh, L.P. 2010 <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1755-263X.2010.00155.x\">Risky business: an uncertain future for biodiversity conservation through REDD+<\/a>. Conservation Letters. Article first published online 22 Dec 2010.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6090],"tags":[],"language":[2170],"location":[],"tag-bahasa":[],"tag-espanol":[],"tag-francais":[],"type-espanol":[],"type-bahasa":[],"type-english":[],"type-francais":[2999],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-1090","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-forests-news","language-francais","type-francais-analyses"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.4 (Yoast SEO v28.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>La formule \u00ab Gagnant-gagnant \u00bb est une description trop simpliste, et probablement fausse, de la REDD+ - Landscape Alliance Forests News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"La formule \u00ab Gagnant-gagnant \u00bb est une description trop simpliste, et probablement fausse, de la REDD+\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Hirsch, P.D., Adams, W.M., Brosius, J.P., Zia, A., Bariola, M. and Dammert, J.L. 2010 Acknowledging conservation trade-offs and embracing complexity. Conservation Biology 25: 259-264. Phelps, J., Webb, E.L., and Koh, L.P. 2010 Risky business: an uncertain future for biodiversity conservation through REDD+. Conservation Letters. Article first published online 22 Dec 2010.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Landscape Alliance Forests News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CIFORICRAF\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-04-19T00:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-24T08:40:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"CIFOR\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@cifor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@CIFOR_ICRAF\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/1090\\\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/1090\\\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"CIFOR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/33964b2bd6b16891f0f4e65f2ead043d\"},\"headline\":\"La formule \u00ab Gagnant-gagnant \u00bb est une description trop simpliste, et probablement fausse, de la REDD+\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-19T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-24T08:40:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/1090\\\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd\"},\"wordCount\":1083,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Forests News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/1090\\\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#respond\"]}],\"copyrightYear\":\"2011\",\"copyrightHolder\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/#organization\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/1090\\\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/1090\\\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd\",\"name\":\"La formule \u00ab Gagnant-gagnant \u00bb est une description trop simpliste, et probablement fausse, de la REDD+ - Landscape Alliance Forests News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-19T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-24T08:40:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/1090\\\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/1090\\\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/1090\\\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"La formule \u00ab Gagnant-gagnant \u00bb est une description trop simpliste, et probablement fausse, de la REDD+\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\",\"name\":\"Landscape Alliance Forests News\",\"description\":\"The latest news on REDD+, climate change, biofuels, gender, conservation, trade, deforestation, indigenous &amp; community groups, dry forests, food security, illegal logging, governance and biodiversity.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":[\"Organization\",\"Place\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr#organization\",\"name\":\"CIFOR-ICRAF\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\",\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/1090\\\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#local-main-organization-logo\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/1090\\\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#local-main-organization-logo\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/CIFORICRAF\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/CIFOR_ICRAF\"],\"telephone\":[],\"openingHoursSpecification\":[{\"@type\":\"OpeningHoursSpecification\",\"dayOfWeek\":[\"Monday\",\"Tuesday\",\"Wednesday\",\"Thursday\",\"Friday\",\"Saturday\",\"Sunday\"],\"opens\":\"09:00\",\"closes\":\"17:00\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/33964b2bd6b16891f0f4e65f2ead043d\",\"name\":\"CIFOR\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d0edacc662331b3e7f1482139a1705cd2919ba8ff1d7457d158c9c5fdcfc56ae?s=96&d=mm&r=ge7d947aa879a614a2298e7a079243687\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d0edacc662331b3e7f1482139a1705cd2919ba8ff1d7457d158c9c5fdcfc56ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d0edacc662331b3e7f1482139a1705cd2919ba8ff1d7457d158c9c5fdcfc56ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"CIFOR\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/cifor\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/author\\\/cifor\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/fr\\\/1090\\\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#local-main-organization-logo\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/cifor-icraf-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forestsnews.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/cifor-icraf-logo.png\",\"width\":596,\"height\":250,\"caption\":\"CIFOR-ICRAF\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"La formule \u00ab Gagnant-gagnant \u00bb est une description trop simpliste, et probablement fausse, de la REDD+ - Landscape Alliance Forests News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"La formule \u00ab Gagnant-gagnant \u00bb est une description trop simpliste, et probablement fausse, de la REDD+","og_description":"Hirsch, P.D., Adams, W.M., Brosius, J.P., Zia, A., Bariola, M. and Dammert, J.L. 2010 Acknowledging conservation trade-offs and embracing complexity. Conservation Biology 25: 259-264. Phelps, J., Webb, E.L., and Koh, L.P. 2010 Risky business: an uncertain future for biodiversity conservation through REDD+. Conservation Letters. Article first published online 22 Dec 2010.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd","og_site_name":"Landscape Alliance Forests News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CIFORICRAF","article_published_time":"2011-04-19T00:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-24T08:40:08+00:00","author":"CIFOR","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@cifor","twitter_site":"@CIFOR_ICRAF","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd"},"author":{"name":"CIFOR","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr#\/schema\/person\/33964b2bd6b16891f0f4e65f2ead043d"},"headline":"La formule \u00ab Gagnant-gagnant \u00bb est une description trop simpliste, et probablement fausse, de la REDD+","datePublished":"2011-04-19T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-24T08:40:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd"},"wordCount":1083,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr#organization"},"articleSection":["Forests News"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#respond"]}],"copyrightYear":"2011","copyrightHolder":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/#organization"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd","url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd","name":"La formule \u00ab Gagnant-gagnant \u00bb est une description trop simpliste, et probablement fausse, de la REDD+ - Landscape Alliance Forests News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr#website"},"datePublished":"2011-04-19T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-24T08:40:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"La formule \u00ab Gagnant-gagnant \u00bb est une description trop simpliste, et probablement fausse, de la REDD+"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr#website","url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr","name":"Landscape Alliance Forests News","description":"The latest news on REDD+, climate change, biofuels, gender, conservation, trade, deforestation, indigenous &amp; community groups, dry forests, food security, illegal logging, governance and biodiversity.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":["Organization","Place"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr#organization","name":"CIFOR-ICRAF","url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr","logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#local-main-organization-logo"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#local-main-organization-logo"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CIFORICRAF","https:\/\/x.com\/CIFOR_ICRAF"],"telephone":[],"openingHoursSpecification":[{"@type":"OpeningHoursSpecification","dayOfWeek":["Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday","Saturday","Sunday"],"opens":"09:00","closes":"17:00"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr#\/schema\/person\/33964b2bd6b16891f0f4e65f2ead043d","name":"CIFOR","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d0edacc662331b3e7f1482139a1705cd2919ba8ff1d7457d158c9c5fdcfc56ae?s=96&d=mm&r=ge7d947aa879a614a2298e7a079243687","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d0edacc662331b3e7f1482139a1705cd2919ba8ff1d7457d158c9c5fdcfc56ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d0edacc662331b3e7f1482139a1705cd2919ba8ff1d7457d158c9c5fdcfc56ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"CIFOR"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/cifor"],"url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/author\/cifor"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/1090\/la-formule-gagnant-gagnant-est-une-description-trop-simpliste-et-probablement-fausse-de-la-redd#local-main-organization-logo","url":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/cifor-icraf-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/cifor-icraf-logo.png","width":596,"height":250,"caption":"CIFOR-ICRAF"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1090","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1090"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1090\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1090"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1090"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1090"},{"taxonomy":"language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/language?post=1090"},{"taxonomy":"location","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/location?post=1090"},{"taxonomy":"tag-bahasa","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tag-bahasa?post=1090"},{"taxonomy":"tag-espanol","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tag-espanol?post=1090"},{"taxonomy":"tag-francais","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tag-francais?post=1090"},{"taxonomy":"type-espanol","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/type-espanol?post=1090"},{"taxonomy":"type-bahasa","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/type-bahasa?post=1090"},{"taxonomy":"type-english","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/type-english?post=1090"},{"taxonomy":"type-francais","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/type-francais?post=1090"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forestsnews.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}